(this post appears on rabble.ca)
Today, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is meeting with provincial ministers of finance in Saskatoon.
Why is this man still at the helm of financial policy making in Ottawa?
This is the finance minister who earlier this year said publicly that he could see little reason why companies would choose to invest in Ontario. His cure for everything, including the massive problems of the auto industry, has been corporate tax cuts. His beef with Queen’s Park was that the Ontario government wasn’t slashing corporate taxes the way Flaherty thought they should.
Just under two months ago, on October 23, here is Jim Flaherty speaking in Calgary:
“Our economic fundamentals are the strongest in the G7. I'm proud to serve as the Finance Minister and travel abroad and meet with my G7 colleagues. I was speaking with one of them this morning on the phone in Europe. Our economic fundamentals are the envy of the G7. We run balanced budgets here…..As I say, other nations are envious of our situation.”
Here is how Flaherty concluded his speech:
“Let me conclude by repeating that our economy has solid economic fundamentals, and Canadians can take some pride in that. I can assure you that our budget will remain balanced. We do have the strongest economic fundamentals in the G7. I can also assure you that our spending will be controlled.”
“Let me end with three good reasons to be optimistic about Canada and our economy. Our economy is strong. Our government is focused with strong leadership by Prime Minister Stephen Harper. And our country is united. My friends, we have a brilliant future together and I thank you for the invitation to be with you today.”
Remember, this speech was delivered after the election---Flaherty was not trolling for votes. This self-centred, smug, bone-headed view of things is what the man actually thought a few weeks ago. He likely still thinks this heap of bromides makes sense.
Even John McCain and Sarah Palin weren’t saying things as dumb as this about the economy in late October.
Then came Flaherty’s Economic Statement on November 27, a document that has been amply analysed for its economics and its politics as dumber than a bag full of hammers (an expression beloved in the Maritimes).
Any competent government on earth by now would have fired a finance minister with a record as dismal as that of Jim Flaherty. No one trusts him. When he tells the media, as he did today, that he wants to work “collaboratively” with provincial finance ministers, it doesn’t pass the giggle test.
Nothing more clearly reveals the ingrained stubborness of the Harper government than the fact that it has not turfed out this incompetent minister.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff ought to pay careful attention to this. He has to decide by late January whether to vote confidence in the Harper government. That vote may come on the new Speech from the Throne or on the Budget. Before choosing to throw in his lot with the “Harper Team”, he ought to ponder what it means that next to the prime minister, Jim Flaherty has been kept on as the number two man on that team.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Harper runs finance, so it's not clear that Flaherty is doing anything wrong himself! ;)
Of course, this could also be Harper using the Bush strategy of "...never admitting mistakes, never saying you're sorry."
Is this were America, Harper would be pinning a medal on Flaherty's chest any day now.
Was going to say that it would be nice if Flaherty could at least fire Harper!
I say, "beware the devil you know"...
Why doesn't Harper fire Flaherty?
Because it would be an admission of failure.
LeonT
That would make the Coalition correct!
Canadians would have to re rally for Canada!
I agree with Mark. Flaherty would not make a move without Harper's direction and/or approval. Nor would Harper make a move without the approval and direction of the Corporations and the U.S. regime. This Government's first loyalty is not to Canadians but rather to the U.S. and perhaps the VERY elite in Canada. He & his gang must go.
"Why Doesn’t Harper Fire Flaherty?"
Because the Cons are complete lost in ideology; "reality" is kicking in (slowly) though.
>i Why doesn't Harper fire Flaherty?<
Because he needs a "credible" fall-guy in case,(read "when"), the budget they concoct takes the country's economy into the ditch...
It seems like a bad omen to say there are good economic fundamentals.
great post -- i can't believe the f'n stupidity of the Cons.
no deficit; yes deficit.
fundamentals good; fundamentals bad.
stimulus already in effect; stimulus coming.
banks sound; banks unsound.
housing market decoupled; housing market bailout.
no recession; get ready for depression.
no tax and spend; deficits coming.
nothing for forestry, mining and manufacturing; something for forestry, mining and manufacturing.
harper and flaherty are going to run a deficit EVEN BEFORE the stimulus package, even though they said they would never run one.
the only reason flaherty and harper are still around is that the corporate media is totally in the bag for them, and most canadians are too dumb to follow what's going on and to keep track of the lies and contradictions.
the only reason flaherty and harper are still around is that the corporate media is totally in the bag for them, and most canadians are too dumb to follow what's going on and to keep track of the lies and contradictions.
Excellent, although I think the ...most canadians are too dumb.... is somewhat simplistic.
Through the concerted efforts of corporate Canada and an intentionally dysfunctional government Canadians are intentionally kept in the dark of what's really going on.
North America's ruling class (corporate and governmental) consist only out of small gene-pool, a gene-pool that is failing us tremendously.
Currently, being so close with the Americans is certainly no asset in these challenging times.
william extracting oregons agreements appoint gsit consider acting cognates sydney captions
masimundus semikonecolori
Post a Comment