(this post appears on rabble.ca)
George W. Bush and Stephen Harper are once again (perhaps for the last time) partners in making economic policy. Now that the U.S. is providing a multi-billion dollar loan to General Motors and Chrysler, Canada is going to do the same. Priority one for Bush and Harper---make the workers take a hefty pay cut.
Read the front pages of the Globe and the Star today and you’ll see it in black and white. The first instinct of those who run corporations and the politicians who do their bidding is to attack unions and the benefits they have won. Take a look at the comments on the Globe story. Dozens of them are replete with vicious insults directed at auto workers and the CAW. A whole sewer full of them.
We should be ready for much more of this. The first and most dependable response of capitalists to a recession---much more so to a depression---is heightened class hatred. Workers are attacked as lazy, ill-educated, slothful, rapacious, unproductive sons of bitches who want more than they deserve. As though the workers in the plants decided on the product mix at Gigantic Motors.
The tactic goes back centuries. Corporate moguls (in the earlier days master tradesmen and merchants) and their scribes launch an assault on well paid workers and do their best to make lower paid workers resentful and envious of those who’ve done better.
Strike down the highest paid workers. That’s what Bush and Harper are determined to do with their loans to the auto makers.
It works like this. If the best paid workers are forced to take cuts, then the pressure will be on for all other wage and salary workers to do the same. Get realistic, the argument goes. “Even the fat cuts on the assembly line took a cut, so now it’s your turn.” The people who found themselves cheering against the auto assemblers will soon find that their ox is the next to get gored. And who will be there to defend them when their turn comes---the unions they so cheerful denigrated.
The first response of business in a recession is to try to force a general pay cut on ALL wage and salary earners. We have entered that phase. This is class war and this one was not declared by the workers.
In the case of the auto workers, the shrieking stories on the front pages seldom point out that in terms of the costs of the Detroit 3 automakers, their labour costs in Canada have declined by about twenty per cent as a consequence of the rapid decline of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. And the stories seldom mention that the health care costs of the companies in the U.S. are largely covered by medicare in Canada. It’s not for nothing that the Big Three have regularly made about twice as much per vehicle produced in Canada as they have in the U.S.
Then there’s the economics of all this. While talk of economic stimulus has been in the air, the old instinct of Bush and Harper to do exactly the opposite comes to the fore.
Slash the pay of auto workers and then after them of wage and salary earners in general and the consequence is to push us more rapidly into deflation, the exact opposite of stimulus. Lower wages mean lower purchasing power. With that comes the further deterioration of retail operations and services in general. Cutting wages and salaries speeds up the downward spiral of the economy from recession to depression.
During the Great Depression of the 1930s, corporate managers and their media flunkies made the same case for wage cuts. And their brilliant logic kept the economy in the doldrums for a decade, ending only with the Second World. War.
Harper’s economic plan will be all about class. He’ll want two kinds of cuts: cuts to the taxes corporations and corporate executives pay; and cuts to the wage and salaries employees earn.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
The new Economic Advisory Council is designed to give Harper some leverage over the Liberals on the tax cut issue. The wage cuts will be divisive, the Liberals and the NDP will not react the same way. So the Harper game plan is becoming clearer, force the Liberals to side with the capitalist class, and pass his budget. If the Liberals fall into the trap they could have considerable trouble finding a role for themselves.
Excellent points, James.
I do feel, however, being a good retired union member, that the time has come for a different strategy on the part of unions.
I have blogged about this issue (Automotive Bailout), I am concerned.
We need to put money into retooling, retraining, and creating viable industry that uses Canadian workers to produce goods and services that will maintain a standard of living. It is time to stop outsourcing and exploiting workers in other countries. Give the money to the workers who can form a collective and produce clean, toxin-free, reliable, environmentally safe products. I resent throwing good money after bad. We need to rethink and reinvent our economy based on the current situation.
Unions need to start being proactive, rather than reactive.
When Harper announced his economic advisory council earlier in the week, with its familiar “corporate Canada guarding their trough” composition, the script for his economic plan virtually wrote itself. If past behaviour is a reliable guide, Canadians will meekly go along with it, reserving their fury for other, less downtrodden workers.
The corporate-owned media will do the job they're paid to do, and anyone who points out, like Professor Laxer here, that what's going on is class warfare will themselves be accused of promoting class warfare. Once again, accusations of “the politics of resentment” will be heard throughout the land.
A few protesting views will be allowed through the media's cordon sanitaire, but they'll be scorned as “the loony left” and most of us will join in, because nothing's more Canadian than biting the hand that feeds you and licking the hand that beats you…then deluding yourself that you're displaying political maturity.
I hope I'm wrong about all of this, but I'm not holding my breath. I can't see the party that gutted EI and cut transfer payments to the provinces for health and education by 40% between '95 and '97 having much trouble playing ball with Harper.
James, I commented to my family today about the comment section of the Globe and Mail - I was disgusted. It was that assembly-line jobs should be minimum wage, no skill required, and so on.
After reading about 100 or so comments, I became so disgusted, and particularly with Harper's comment in the Globe about expanding EI, and taxpayers would essentially be needing their "pound of flesh from them."
Of course we all know that taxpayers don't pay into this pot of gold that the previous lib govt used as their personal slush fund.
Harper knows that too.
Well, this is class warfare James, and if the Liberals act as Harper's bumboys well, the level of disgust I will have for them will make me ensure that nobody ever thinks of that party of being progressive again.
Jan: This is the key test for the Liberals. As Duncan said, Harper is trying to force the Liberals to side with the capitalist class. The next month will reveal a great deal about the line-up of political forces.
I agree, and I linked my post today on my blog with your post here, quoting both you and Duncan.
The narrative will be the prince and the pauper 2009.
"A whole sewer full of them".
Luv' it!
My questions is:Why hasn't anybody, other than a few BC NDPers ranted about the minimum wage?
Even at $12/hr, those of those who serve Canadians on a daily basis in work that somebody's got to do,view a pound of butter as a LUXURY item.
ml, I think no one's talking about raising the minimum wage because it's political suicide. I'm in BC, so I've been able to watch the reaction to the suggestion from close up, and it ain't pretty. BC has the worst child poverty in the country, but the shrieks of protest when anyone proposes increasing the minimum wage are deafening.
Several weeks ago, the media noted that many Canadians are ignorant about Parliamentary democracy. There is also amazing ignorance about the inherent conflict of interest between labour and capital. I never heard of such a thing until I hit the university. Up until then, I drank in the anti-union comments of my solidly working class but non-unionized family members who taught me that the unions were to blame for everything.
Now, this stuff infuriates me. I noticed that the Globe & Mail was blaming the UAW for the failure of the bailout even when that aspect of the deal was not being frontlined by the NYT, which at least seemed to understand the brazen politics played by the Republicans.
Letter to Editor - Vancouver Sun
In attempting to 'reach out' for input on its next budget, the Conservative Government has assembled an eminent 11- person advisory committee containing diverse experience ranging all the way from Corporate CEO to Corporate President. Since those who run big corporations do not spend their time sitting around their boardrooms pondering the plight of the poor, the old, the sick, the disabled, the unemployed and the descent of the middle class, why should we expect the deliberations of this panel to produce impartial advice? Let's have an economic advisory council that represents the diverse interests of Canadians and not just those of the corporate elite. It's time for us to stop taking bad advice from the same people who gave it to us in the first place.
Happy Birthday Jim! (am I belated in this?)
Thanks Tashi. Actually it's the 22nd. I won't light a candle for every year today because it would compete with the emissions of the oil sands.
While I think unions must accept some responsibility for the current crisis, I believe the time has come for some leadership of a proactive nature at the CAW. I didn't hear that from the current leader's comments last week.
What I did hear, and confirmed by stories in the news from the Big Three, was that half a million jobs would be affected in Ontario alone. So what kind of guilt-trip are we to support? The Auto industry is dying and it's time for workers, politicians and owners to admit it. In the next 2 years, I bet you GM or Ford or Crysler will be declaring bankruptcy. They've had their chance and now it's time to let it die a natural death.
As far as Harper is concerned, he's playing the game as best he can and it's called "politics".
LeonT
I can only agree with James Laxer's position with regard to the rescue package. As a former Unit Chair with a CAW local I have seen the Right continually attack labour and workers in general. I have commented in my own blog regarding this to the point I am finding myself getting repetitive.But the issues are too important to be allowed to pass without a struggle.
http://mycatmaybeasocialist.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment