Monday, December 22, 2008

Bailouts, Bonuses and Fat-Cat Economic Advisors

(this post appears on rabble.ca)

In 2006, which was a very good year at Merrill Lynch, Dow Kim, at the time Executive Vice President and President of Global Markets and Investment Banking, took home a modest salary, $350,000. But then he received a bonus that made things more comfortable for him---$35 million.

That year Merrill’s profits came in at a record $7.5 billion. To express its appreciation not only to the top guns at the company like Kim, but also to the company analysts who had helped make it all happen, the company paid out between $5 billion and $6 billion in bonuses that year. Analysts in their twenties with salaries of around $130,000 received bonuses of $250,000. Company traders in their thirties, a little higher up the pecking order, with salaries of $180,000 were treated to bonuses of $5 million.

There was a problem at Merrill though. The record profits were illusory. Because the company was so heavily invested in mortgages that have since crashed in value, Merrill has lost three times as much as the fat profit realized in 2006.

The geniuses at Merrill Lynch played a role in driving the economy over the cliff. But they haven’t returned the bonuses they received, bonuses that allowed them to live like modern day Roman aristocrats.

Even since the crash and the multi billion dollar bailouts, the bonuses haven’t stopped flowing. Things aren’t as lavish as they were a couple of years ago, but bankers in New York are still in line for bonuses worth millions of dollars a year.

In the media, both south and north of the border, however, the target of choice these days is the unionized auto worker, whose annual salary wouldn’t pay for one fat-cat dinner in New York to celebrate bonus day. During the smash-up of the economy over the last three months, it was unclear what direction the political right would take to cope with their new surroundings. Now it’s become all too clear. The American right and its Canadian subsidiary will devote their energies to attacking auto workers and other unionized wage and salary earners.

Meanwhile, the Harper government has assembled an eleven member economic council to advise it on the upcoming federal budget. No workers or trade unionists were asked to participate. Instead the council is replete with millionaires and billionaires---Jim Pattison, Paul Desmarais Jr., and James D. Irving among them. I wonder if they’ll recommend corporate taxes as a way to stimulate the economy!

The Harperites are operating on the theory that people who know how to make money for themselves are experts on how to manage an economy for everyone. Anyone who believes this should read John Kenneth Galbraith’s classic, The Great Crash: 1929. He tells the story of how the big New York bankers thought all they had to do was to ride to the rescue of the stock market and reinvigorate it with a spirit of confidence. They tried it, were cheered for a couple of hours, and then the Depression took hold.

The truth is that tycoons know very little about the economy. They tend to assume that because they made it so big they have some special insight into how things work in the economy and society. Usually their assumptions amount to little more than a grab bag of Social Darwinist ravings about how the true giants rise to the top in the ferocious jungle of the real world and that’s how homo sapiens makes progress. Tycoons often think they conceived of this theory of the world themselves as a consequence of their own life experience. Little do they know that they are reciting tracts from some hack who was writing in the late 19th century.

The dirty little secret of capitalists is that they all know that it benefits them in their own enterprises to keep wages as low as possible. Paradoxically though, they also know that to sell their goods and services somebody out there has to have money to spend. In their economic theorizing, the fat cats can never get around this elementary conundrum. And that takes them back to their fantasies about themselves as Big Cats in the jungle.

Two final notes:

I’m so glad that the CBC has decided to balance its left-leaning At Issue Panel by adding Rex Murphy to it.

And congratulations to Harper’s 18 new senators. Now that Mike Duffy is in the Senate, he can interview himself about the ethics of a Prime Minister who prorogued parliament to prevent his government from being defeated on a vote a confidence but feels free to anoint Senators before parliament resumes and he receives that vote of confidence.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Too bad the Don Newman show is off for Christmas; I would have loved to see him interview the Duffster about journalistic ethnics.

Maybe sometime in the future....

Anonymous said...

Prof. Jim:
Then there are the so-called Canadian auto experts who swarmed the media when the news of the so-called auto bailout came out. All had the same message: "To be profitable, the Detroit 3 will have to cut wages, workers' that is. Rubbish! Those neocons never mention the pickup plants that made money before fuel hikes and the subprime crash. If the 3 could make vehicles the public wants, they'd be profitable, maybe, not as profitable as Toyota, etc., but they'd be in the black. What unions do is compel the automakers to share some of the profits with the communities where they're made.
Those Canadian experts like Toyota and Honda workers because they are humble and expendable.

naomi said...

happy birthday, Jim.
Too bad there's no good news to celebrate it with.
and shouldn't bonuses be some percentage of earnings, rather than a lottery prize? where did all this outsized bonus stuff begin?

Anonymous said...

Mike Duffy has publically stated that an appointment to the Canadian Senate is a "taskless thanks".

I wonder if he feels that way now?

LeonT

Anonymous said...

This is a really great post, you made a good point about the unfair targeting of union workers who do not even have a fraction of what the big "cats" are getting in their yearly bonus. Harper's senate appointments are a sham and I do not think the public are so blind not to see through the smoke.

Anonymous said...

Whoa. I almost missed your "irony" in the CBC NationalNews issue panel comment. I was really freaked out there for a moment -- Rex Murphy, left, congratulations --- wtf? It's really terrible, isn't it? I wonder if conservatives still complain about the CBC's bias... wouldn't surprise me.

Anonymous said...

"The dirty little secret of capitalists is that they all know that it benefits them in their own enterprises to keep wages as low as possible. Paradoxically though, they also know that to sell their goods and services somebody out there has to have money to spend."


Of course the difference is made up by getting people to borrow heavily. Also there's a lot of money to me made in the lending business. Unfortunately in a system where people borrow and borrow more, and have less and less money to pay off their debts, the system eventually hits a wall. Welcome to the financial and economic crisis!

Oemissions said...

That Mr. Madoff sure knew something about the economy. I don"t know how to pronounce his name right, but I'm sure it must be made-off. Well, almost.
Seems as tho' quite a few Wall Streeters didn't have a good grasp of economics either.
Mr. Harper taking a cavalcade of 5 cars to go see the GG when she was just a stone's throw away makes me wonder if he knows anything about budgeting.
Probably left the cars idling too.....
Does this really mean that there will be a vacancy with CTV?
Hope they don't promote that guy who doesn't know how to pose a question so that someone versed in the Queen's English understands it..... Then Mr. Duffy rubs his short fat hands together and says, let's run it 3 times. So I sure hope it won't be that Murphy guy. Another Steve if I remember correctly.
Apparently there once was an interviewer with a TV network who made Mr. Harper quite uncomfortable during an interview a few years back, and this year Mr. Harper said he would not grant an interview if it was going to be that guy.
Guess that's why interviewers are kinda shy about asking him questions.
I thought there would be greater equality in wages by this time in the history of mankind.There certainly was some progress made when the unions were formed.
Beats me how someone can earn as much or more in a month as somebody does in a year for work that is just as valuable.
Imagine staying at a hotel where the room hasn't been cleaned for a week.Or a public washroom,after heavy use in even one day.
Oh well, I guess these well to doers drop a few boxes of Kraft Dinner into the box for the foodbank at Christmas time.
Good to hear from you again!

susansmith said...

larryk hit the nail on the head - provide unlimited credit. Take note, credit is provided with huge interest rate. It does not matter if the consumer ever pays it off, (as long as they pay the interest),it's a money maker in itself with 18-22% charged.
Of course, this is just large "legal" pyramid scheme waiting for it to collapse. The same greedy guys at the top, got their payout, and it's the poor suckers on the bottom, who don't get their payout.

Anonymous said...

Mike Duffy = Jabba the (Tory) Hack!

I'm from the Maritime where Mike Duffy provides commentary to our local CTV affiliate. He used to be good, but in the last couple of years turned into a complete Conservative hack.

Over the calling of the last election, Duffy completely defended the Prime Minister's position and said that, "you cannot attack the Prime Minister's integrity." This while he claims to be an "objective journalist," because, after all, we all know Harper's widespread reputation for "integrity."

In the end, Harper rewarded his Conservative hack well with the plumest patronage position in the land.

Unknown said...

Rex should fit in perfectly on the At Issue panel. Every time I watch them I think of Tony Kushner, the author of Angels in America, and his comment: “The terms of the national debate have subtly, insidiously shifted. What used to be called liberal is now called radical; what used to be called radical is now called insane. What used to be called reactionary is now called moderate, and what used to be called insane is now called solid conservative thinking.” He could just as easily have easily have been talking about Canada.

Richard Sharp said...

May We Please Have A Proper Survey on the Coalition Alternative?


Many opinion polls range from meaningless to marginally useful, depending on the ethics and competence of the pollster. At worst, they can be likened to mob rule. Wrap any issue up in fear and smear and the “Hang ‘em high” option wins almost every time. The recent polls finding a majority of Canadians against the Liberal/NDP coalition and preferring yet another election instead is a case in point.

Let’s examine that incredible week. Mr. Harper put off a non-confidence vote that would have brought him down until the following Monday. He then unleashed a ferocious and fundamentally dishonest attack against the “separatist coalition,” whipping Canadians into a frenzy. Any inflammatory language would do: “sedition, treason, coup d’etat, undemocratic, back-room deal with separatists and socialists” and on and on.

Enter the “liberal” media to escalate the attack. AM radio talk hosts almost uniformly go bananas against the coalition. (Lowell Green in Ottawa scared up 2500 emails in just a day or two.) Newspaper headlines like “No! No! No!” spring up across the land, particularly those in the Sun and Canwest chains. Can you guess their editorial and reporting slant?

Now unleash the Conservative hordes on the Internet, especially on such enemy websites as the CBC and The Star. Even send your paid staffers to picket the Governor General’s residence.

Time now for polls (have I mentioned Canwest) to prove Canadians are against this “deal with the devil.” Loaded, leading questions? Of course.

It doesn’t matter that the Conservatives and their media cronies are uniformly wrong about the coalition. Fear and smear works. Karl Rove would be proud of his students up here.

The real coup d’etat took place at Rideau Hall. Faced with certain defeat on Monday, Mr. Harper asked the Governor General to prorogue Parliament until the end of January. At this historic moment, Ms. Jean let this country down, big-time.

Ms. Jean was in possession of 161 signatures from all three opposition parties advising her that the PM had lost the confidence of the House, that they had formed a coalition to replace him and that they had an economic stimulus plan to take immediate action to fight the economic meltdown. The leader of the Green party supported the coalition, meaning the representatives of 62% of voters were willing and able to form a new government. Incredibly, she chose to allow Parliament to be prorogued. The Tories still had life.

It was a whole new ball game for the Liberals. They could no longer wait until May to choose a new leader and all of Messrs. Dion, Leblanc and Rae acted honourably and swiftly by standing down in Mr. Ignatieff’s favour. In a sense, Mr. Ignatieff has become the most powerful man in the country because, ultimately, he will decide whether the coalition lives or dies.

The “liberal” media aren’t giving it much credence. Even seasoned pundits like Jim Travers and Thomas Walkom of the Star and Rex Murphy in the Globe are using terms like “discredited,” “fiasco” and “Jerry-rigged.” Preston Manning, Thomas Axworthy and many others have published op-ed pieces condemning it. Except for Linda McQuaig, there has been nary a word in the coalition’s support.

Nary a word. Funny about that.

Mr. Harper has burned his bridges with the NDP and the Bloc (and all of Quebec). His only hope is to offer an economic stimulus package sufficient to appease the Liberals for the time being. Alternatively, with his poll numbers up (see above), he just may engineer his government’s fall and make a fourth attempt to form a majority in five years. The economic meltdown? That would have to wait.

The Governor General has been snookered twice by Mr. Harper, in dissolving the last session of Parliament on false pretenses, and now by suspending the new one to avoid a non-confidence vote. Twice bitten, thrice shy?

Which brings us back to the coalition accord, still a signed deal promoting greater and faster action on the economy than anything the Tories have come up with. It could be amended to include a whole swath of additional progressive initiatives on the environment, help for the most disadvantaged, reregulation of food safety, unmuzzling the bureaucracy, empowering the Parliamentary budget officer, proportional representation and on and on. Think the opposite of 2+ years of failed neo-con policies.

So we need an honest poll about the costs and benefits of the last election, the suspension of Parliament in an economic crisis and the coalition alternative vs. yet another election.

rgl said...

Harper as a Liberal in Disguise

I do have to admit that the latest actions taken by Stpehen Harper have had an impact on my thinking. As the current Prime Minister, he is within his rights to make Senate appointments. It doesn’t matter that he has campaigned vociferously against just such actions. He is the Prime Minister and this is Canada. As for who is appointed, it really doesn’t matter. Some will be good senators and some will just collect the money. This is as it always has been.

There is one appointment though that has me shaking my head, that of Michel Rivard who was elected to the Quebec government in 1994 as a member of the Parti Quebecois. In 1995, he was a strong supporter of the sovereignty referendum. I guess it takes all kinds of people to sit in the senate, even avowed Quebec separatists. I just didn’t think that Harper would have even thought of appointing a separatist to the Senate. But then again, it might have the people of Quebec rethink their aversion to Harper. If so, this is a brilliant tactical move.

With all the activity since Parliament has been porogued, it appears to almost the most active the government of Stephen Harper has been. I guess one can get a lot done without the nonsense of listening to opposition members waste time and energy.

Looking back over these past two weeks and the activity, I would swear that we had a Liberal government that had decided to go for broke with the cheque book. Perhaps, Harper has realised that he is a better Liberal than he ever was a Conservative. Of course, his early roots are in Ontario and as a young liberal in high school. It pays to listen carefully and watch. We now have the Conservative Liberal party (CLP) in power with the Liberal Liberal party getting ready to prop it up while the CLP learns how to govern as Liberals. Who is the puppet and who is the master?

http://retiredeagle2.wordpress.com/

rgl

Anonymous said...

James,

Another great post.

Also, some of the comments here are dead-on.

Anonymous said...

This is tedious, difficult work viagra uk online How many times have you been watching a favorite program and been influenced to eat because you saw a food commercial? Turn off the tube and use the time to organize the closet, go for a walk, garden, or do anything that gets you moving To be specific, you need to choose fiber-rich variety of beans like black beans, kidney beans, or pinto beans generic cialis DiscomfortOnce you noticed that you have more than one of those common signs above given, it is for sure