Friday, January 08, 2010

The Next Step: Challenging Harper’s Agenda

Having underestimated the acuity of the Canadian people, the Harper government has been placed on the defensive. While the mainstream media cheered them on and their pollsters reassured them that they were on a winning path, Stephen Harper and his ministers blithely assumed that Canadians were not interested in the Afghan detainees scandal and the environment, and that they couldn’t care less about the prorogation of parliament. The accepted narrative of recent months was that Stephen Harper was on the cusp of a majority and all he had to do was to trigger an election while appearing not to want one.

Now, however, there is a full-scale political revolt going on in the country. Canadians are mad as hell about the decision to prorogue parliament. They see it for what it is, a blatant maneuver to stop the questioning of government ministers about the Afghan detainee issue.

In the eyes of Canadians, Stephen Harper is a dictatorial leader, who does not respect the role of parliament in our political system. Even during a minority government, he is incapable of sharing the reins of power with the members of the other parties in the House of Commons.

Now that the people are against him---the Conservatives received the support of only 33.1 per cent of voters in the latest Ekos poll---Harper’s next move will be to try to divide the opposition parties and put the popular movement that opposes him in the ditch.

He’s going to make the case that it is now time for the government to shift gears on economic policy----to abandon stimulus for severe cuts to government spending. For Harper, this will not be a surprising development. He will be returning to type. He was always unenthusiastic about stimulus. He believed instead that economic recovery ought to be achieved by slashing government programs and cutting taxes.

It was a tell-tale sign of where this government’s heart really lay that Finance Minister Jim Flaherty went on proclaiming as late as the end of October 2008, after the federal election was over, that Canada would not have to run a deficit to cope with the economic crisis. By then the stock markets of the world had crashed and the U.S. government (with George W. Bush still in the White House) and that of the UK had undertaken massive programs to bail out failing firms and reflate the economy.

The Harper government’s stimulus budget last winter---a half-hearted one at that---was a political ploy to stave off defeat in the House of Commons. Now that the stock market has recovered, although not to the highs on the eve of the crash, the Conservatives want to return to their small government ways. They want to take the road favoured by the re-energized, right-wing Republicans south of the border.

Just as the free-market economics of the political right got us into the economic crisis in the first place, Conservatives in Canada and Republicans in the U.S. now advocate policies that will prolong it, and that run the risk of making this a double-dip recession.

What we are going to see when the House of Commons reconvenes in early March will be a Speech from the Throne and a budget that lay out an austerity program. The Harper government will declare that the battle for economic recovery has largely been won---a claim that is palpably false---and that it is now time to abandon stimulus for cuts.

That’s where the opposition comes in. The Liberals and the NDP need to challenge the core of Harper’s policy agenda. When they go back to work on January 25, they need to come up with a set of proposals to continue the stimulus required to create jobs so that the recovery involves more than Bay Street. Beyond that, they should point to a broad set of policies to refashion Canadian economic policy, so that the country can adapt to the realities of a world in which the United States will, of necessity, play a less central role. Those policies need to abandon the Harper government’s singular attachment to the petroleum companies and the dead-end concept of Canada becoming an “energy superpower” on the strength of growing oil sands production and exports. The new agenda will have to centre on environmental sustainability, on nothing less than the rebuilding of our cities and transportation systems for a world in which climate change and Peak Oil are the compelling realities. Such an agenda carries with it the promise of job creation. It can place Canada at the centre of the establishment of the green global economy of the 21st century.

The opposition parties should challenge the Conservatives to take up this approach, thereby making the minority parliament work. Should the Conservatives refuse to do so, the Liberals and the NDP should vote no confidence in the government. That would trigger an election, but it would be an election forced by the unwillingness of Stephen Harper and his ministers to adopt an agenda that would allow all of the parties in the House to have a genuine say in the shaping of government policies.

Such an election would be worth fighting. Stephen Harper would lose it.


Northern PoV said...

Such an election will only be worth fighting if the NDP & Liberals forge an electoral detente along the lines that King did with the Progressives in 1926.

Oemissions said...

Yes, the other parties need to let go of their big egos.
I keep wondering: who are these people that change the poll count.?

Richard Levangie said...

James... This is a brilliant analysis. Thanks.

And yes, the Liberals and NDP need to have some manner of detente before bringing down the government.

Anonymous said...

The old guard within the LPC is obdurate in their insistence on not sharing power with any other party. They’re the real impediment to a detente, since they’ve made it clear that they don’t really care what they govern, as long as they get to be in charge again. What kind of appeal do you make to people like that?

Anonymous said...

Couldn't agree mores James. I must say however, that I'm not at all convinced that the opposition parties can rise to the challenge. Ignatieff has proven remarkably less than impressive, and I wasn't expecting much to begin with. Layton is nowhere to be seen or heard. Let's hope for an opposition miracle before March.

Jake said...

The links and URLs don't copy here, so you will have to google.

An electoral coalition is being proposed by John Ryan, and you can also read supporting articles by David Orchard and Michael Ryan.

All three are found on David Orchard's site ---

By Stuart Hertzog, Nov 2nd, 2008 A tripartite ... coalition can succeed ... according to John Ryan.

John Ryan, Ph.D., is a retired professor and senior scholar at the University of Winnipeg

A combined version of this plus the --- --- subsequent article in this series is available online at
Global Research, October 29, 2008.

John Hepworth said...

Here’s a copy of the e-mail that I sent to CBC’s "As It Happens" after Harper prorogued parliament last time. You might find it interesting and/or worth a chuckle especially if you check out "The Music Man" video I refer to and think Harper as Professor Harold Hill - minus the charm of course.

“In your discussion of Stephen Harper‘s latest extra-parliamentary stunt I was interested to hear Scott Brison refer to Harper as “such an opportunist”. Yes. He got it exactly right. And since Harper has decided to tear us all a new….Constitutional Option, now comes The Selling of the Vision viz. enter Stephen Harper as Professor Harold Hill in "The Music Man" singing “Ya Got Trouble (Right Here in River City)”…… If you substitute the word “Bloc” for the word “pool” and shut your eyes for a moment you can almost see the delirious throngs - in Harper’s vision- preparing to march on Ottawa and sign up for trombone lessons.

Fortunately amidst all this mess Harper’s own over-reaching, my-way-or-the-highway personality and approach to government has so poisoned his reputation in Quebec he will never get that Majority he so longs for and seems to imagine that he deserves. Hubris to the rescue! In which case another image comes to mind: that of Stephen Harper as Mister Toad in "The Wind in the Willows" with his fatal self-important mania for driving Minority Governments full throttle into the ground.

Check out The Number/song and lyrics

And now he’s doing it again !! Is there a game show in this ?? What’s next ? Will Michaelle be knighting him soon ?

yours truly, John Hepworth

Anonymous said...

I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question. I have a nice joke for you) How do you revive a drowning rodent? Give it mouse-to-mouse resuscitation. viagera

Anonymous said...

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Otis said...

I found your blog when I was looking for a different sort of information but I was very happy and glad to read thru your blog. The information available here is great.
Artificial turf supplier

Astro Turf said...

You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses taking time and real effort to make a good article !!


Dog Run said...

What a wonderful piece of information Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer! I will bookmark your blog and have my children check up here often.

Camelia Aprile said...

I have been searching for a website like this in the field I am interested in. I am a big fan. airplay for android was thinking about creating my own blog about similar ideas for like-minded people. Some good ideas here.

Artificial Grass Prices said...

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand.

artificial grass prices